Get Rid Of Chicken Pox Marks

Investigation for a network popular among quake relief Abruzzo

The data reflect the situation of respondents to June and were collected mostly among the displaced camps.
The survey did not test value, and reduced the size of the sample and its heterogeneity, but brings with it the voice of the complaint and the need for self-organization. But first we do a quick guide the investigation, referring to the tables and graphs attached for more detailed analysis

An initial budget

Almost half of men surveyed and over 2 / 3 of women who responded to the questionnaire said they were busy, with work temporary or black, before the earthquake of 6 April.
Following the earthquake, the total number of employed respondents has halved, mainly at the expense of women. About three-quarters of respondents, who have lost their jobs after the earthquake are women.
88% of respondents had lost the practicability of their home. 83% lived in a house building privata e il 17 % in una casa popolare. Il 67 % viveva in una casa di proprietà e il 24% stava ancora pagando il mutuo.
Diversi intervistati hanno perso i propri famigliari a causa del sisma, sia nelle case di edilizia privata che in quelle di edilizia pubblica.

Responsabilità

Il 26% egli intervistati, soprattutto donne, ha notato lesioni nei propri luoghi di abitazione e/o lavoro prima del sisma e le ha segnalate agli organi competenti e/o al datore di lavoro, chiedendo più sicurezza.
Nel 23% dei casi, l’abitazione era stata spacciata per antisismica e il 53% degli intervistati ha ammesso di essere was reassured and persuaded to return home, despite the high probability of a severe seismic event.
a worker who lived in public housing says, "has always lived with fear because of the apparent fragility of the structures (and thank goodness it was public housing estate!) .
About 80% of respondents identified generically in the institutions responsible for this tragedy waiting to happen, assigning specific responsibilities, in descending order, to: State / Government, Region, City, Civil Protection, Province.
28% of respondents then indicated in the constructors specific responsibilities.
Beyond the cold data of the investigation, we want to bring some hot comments issued by the respondents to the question: "Who do you feel responsible for what happened?"
"state, because it has changed the guidelines seismic"
"Region, State, political groups and economic-business"
"All institutions, including civil protection, which has reassured rather than to the tent for a week before"

And again "Who downgraded L'Aquila from zone 1 to zone 2 and the Civil Protection , "All" , "Assassins, shot himself ..." , "politicians" , "the state and the companies building for the poor quality of housing" , "the City that issued the plan ", " The State, because he has changed the guidelines for seismic building " etc..

Relief

69% of respondents complained of late or insufficient relief. When asked: "From 3.32 h April 6, how long after you have received first aid from bodies?
"after 3 days I received first aid, because I came to the camp," said a woman who has lost more than one day to the house and the work he had just found, "after 7 days and I've searched I, "says another. In the best cases, if I may say so, the respondents have received first aid after about 2 hours and almost always it was the bus that brought them to the sea, where they remained for several months.
Among the major inconvenience lived inside and outside the camp, reported that the displaced have found, first place goes to the militarization (76%), followed, in descending order, by forced cohabitation, lack of income (65%), lack of adequate air conditioning, lack of information (57%), bureaucracy, lack of autonomy, poor sanitation, idle / boredom, obstacles to mobility, congestion, inconvenience to women (33%), poor nutrition, inadequate healthcare, poor attendance, inefficiency.
74% of respondents expressed the sense of a worsening of such disruptions in the G8, but obviously there was, by committees, the willingness to listen and to organize the expression of these discomforts and this anger, evidently too critical delle istituzioni locali.

Partecipazione e disponibilità a mobilitarsi

Di fatto, a giugno inoltrato, dopo la manifestazione del 16, più del 30 % degli intervistati dichiarava di non essere a conoscenza della campagna 100%, promossa dai comitati cittadini. Non si è trattato solo di un problema di comunicazione e di informazione (la campagna 100% e i comitati avevano ormai acquistato grande visibilità, sia su “Il centro” che in città, con enormi manifesti di propaganda e a livello nazionale), ma anche di trasparenza e partecipazione. Trasparenza, perché la rete dei comitati cittadini si è ben guardata dallo stigmatizzare l’ambiguità local institutions before and after the earthquake. Participation, because this is a statement of fact remained on the 3rd point of the campaign 100% and people in the flesh were not called to express its contents, except with a signature platform has already been decided. It is intended, ultimately, to give citizens a marginal role, by users and not as a protagonist, even in the choices related to the struggle and the mobilization efforts of the committees. The same liabilities that a fake democratic regime requires its voters a vote uncritical.
An important fact to note is that for the area filling in the questionnaire investigation. Only a minima parte di essi è stata compilata tra le soggettività che si potrebbero definire “più attive” nel movimento degli sfollati, ossia i comitati cittadini, presenti alle manifestazioni di maggio e giugno. La stessa inchiesta, che ho cercato di promuovere a partire dalla manifestazione del 30 maggio, è stata, per dirla in maniera morbida, ignorata dai comitati. Infatti in quella occasione mi è stato negato per la prima volta l’accesso al megafono da parte di alcuni rappresentanti dei comitati, per presentare l’inchiesta e lasciare il mio contatto.
Tra le masse invece, l’inchiesta è stata accolta con una certa curiosità e superata un’iniziale diffidenza, i cittadini have expressed their views without gags and their hardships. From this we must start to build a network of horizontal and participatory mobilization.
For most respondents, the condition was not suffering more than the failure to "rebuild a 100%", but came looking invasive and military machinery of so-called relief, an issue designed to amplify during the G8, to completely distort the meaning of that presence as a function undemocratic and oppressive.
This network of committees wanted to ignore, not defending the choices and the shaky position statements of the mayor and local government.
Most respondents actually claimed 100% transparency and participation, not only by the institutions themselves and not by citizens' committees, including those of a certain left colluding with power.
Even this network of committees wanted to ignore.
This investigation no. In his little these people had not heard, far from the megaphones and the stage that he wanted to give voice and is doing it.

74% of respondents, many of them in the parade ground and out of the network of committees, he feared the G8 because they have already suffered a heavy militarization of the territory and their lives and did not expect anything good, no money, no job to an event like that, contrary to some owners, such as Natalia Nunzia, that after staying for months at the Grand Hotel Montesilvano and made money for a new G8 with nougat, parade on July 9 with the network of committees, showing the sign of the last ladies and yes we camp holding up the banner!

To finish with the investigation, 81% of respondents, however, expressed his willingness to mobilize efforts in truly participatory.
If this willingness has ceased to exist but we must ask why this and not so much argue as to not repeat mistakes.
Asked final investigation (Would you be available to resume your activities and / or to participate actively in initiatives on your living conditions, jobs, housing, offering platforms, points of claim, organization, etc.? ) Was a clear space for respondents. Here are the most significant expressions:
"depends on with whom, not with those rich people in my country, which are privileged, ammanicati with the mayor and had no damage ..."
"Give us back the houses with the seismic structure ! "
" Just go away and leave us in peace in the reconstruction of our city! "
"Give us back the houses as they were before and give us the money to renovate"
"Points of organization, information, removal of tents, freedom from terror"
"yes, there is little initiative on the part of the press local and general information in "

But the most popular was the demand for labor:
" are willing to work, otherwise I Moremi of hunger all! "